P. Lagadec and . Politique, risque et processus de développement : Le risque technologique majeur, Thèse de doctorat d'état en science politique, 1980.

«. Bgn, Draft methodology on risk assessment of unit operations and equipment, Rase Project, pp.1-50

B. Rasmussen and C. Whetton, «Hazard identification on plant functional modelling», Reliability Engineering and System Safety, pp.77-84, 1997.

E. Korjusiommi, R. Salo, and R. Taylor, « Hazard analysis for batch processes and for special operations, proceeding from 9 th International Symposium Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries, pp.422-431, 1998.

F. I. Khan and S. A. , Abbasi, « Techniques and methodologies for risk analysis in chemical process industries, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, pp.261-277, 1998.

M. Nicolet-monnier, Integrated regional risk assessment : the situation in Switzerland, Int. J. Environment and Pollution, vol.6, pp.4-6, 1996.

A. Toola, Plant level safety analysis, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol.5, issue.2, pp.119-124, 1992.
DOI : 10.1016/0950-4230(92)80008-V

R. Kennedy and B. Kirwan, Development of a Hazard and Operability-based method for identifying safety management vulnerabilities in high risk systems, Safety Science, vol.30, issue.3, pp.249-274, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0925-7535(98)00025-3

F. I. Khan and S. A. Abbasi, OptHAZOP???an effective and optimum approach for HAZOP study, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, pp.191-204, 1997.
DOI : 10.1016/S0950-4230(97)00002-8

P. D. Sankey, An insurer's involvement in the risk reduction process, proceeding from 9 th International Syi Industries from 9 th International Symposium Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process, pp.441-450, 1998.

P. W. Chung, E. Broomfield, and S. H. Yang, « Safety related questions for computercontrolled plants : derivation, organisation and application, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, pp.397-406, 1998.

S. Yang and P. W. Chung, Hazard analysis and support tool for computer controlled processes, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, pp.333-345, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0950-4230(98)00012-6

C. Delvosalle, C. Fievez, and F. Benjelloun, « Development of a methodology for the identification of potential domino effects in « Seveso » industries, proceeding from 9 ( International Symposium Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries, pp.1252-1261, 1998.

N. W. Hurst, S. Young, I. Donald, H. Gibson, and A. , Muyselaar, «Measures of safety management performance and attitudes to safety at major hazard sites, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, pp.161-172, 1996.

R. M. Pitblado, J. C. Williams, and D. H. Slater, Quantitative assessment of process safety programs, Plant/Operations Progress, vol.9, issue.3, pp.169-175, 1990.
DOI : 10.1002/prsb.720090317

F. I. Khan and S. A. Abbasi, Accident Hazard Index, Trans IChemE, pp.217-224, 1997.
DOI : 10.1205/095758297529093

P. Jâger and K. Kuhnreich, « Approach to a systematic determination and evaluation of risk potential, proceeding from 9 th International 5

C. S. Kao and Y. S. Duh, « Chemical runaway reaction hazard index and risk assessment, proceeding from 9 1 International Symposium Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries, pp.965-975, 1998.

O. Dolladille, Proposition d'une méthode d'analyse d'effet domino, Préventiquesécurité, pp.62-70, 1999.

M. D. Troutt and H. H. Elsaid, The Potential Value of Saaty???s Eigenvector Scaling Method for Short-Term Forecasting of Currency Exchange Rates, SIAM Review, vol.38, issue.4, pp.650-654, 1996.
DOI : 10.1137/S003614459325234X

K. Oien, S. Sklet, and L. Nielsen, « Development of risk level indicators for petroleum production platform, proceeding from 9 th International Symposium Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries, pp.382-393, 1998.

J. Holmberg, « Risk follow up by probabilistic safety assessment-experience from a finish pilot study », Reliability Engineering and System Safety, pp.3-15, 1996.

W. Jezler, « Earthquake safety of structures and installations in chemical industry in the context of risk analysis, proceeding from 9 th International Symposium Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries, pp.414-421, 1998.

A. Kusiak and A. Zakarian, Risk assessment of process models, Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol.30, issue.4, pp.599-610, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/0360-8352(95)00178-6

N. Larson and A. Kusiak, « Managing design processes : a risk assessment approach », IEEE Transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics-part A: systems and humans, pp.749-759, 1996.

K. J. Ham, H. J. Van-kessel, and T. Wiersma, Experiences with a safety report according to Seveso II : a pilot project in the Netherlands, proceeding from 9 th International Symposium Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries, pp.1326-1340, 1998.

F. I. Khan and S. A. Abbasi, Inherently safer design based on rapid risk analysis, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, pp.361-372, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0950-4230(97)00042-9

G. Tiemessen and J. P. Van-zweeden, « risk assessment of the transport of hazardous materials, proceeding from 9 th International Symposium Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries, pp.299-307, 1998.

I. Puertas, J. C. Sanz, C. Vaquero, M. Marono, and R. Sola, Procedure for the review of quantitative risk assessment of the process industries, proceeding from 9 l International Symposium Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries, pp.283-288, 1998.

I. A. Papazoglou, Z. Noivolianitou, O. Aneziris, and M. Christou, Probabilistic safety analysis in chemical installations, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, pp.181-191, 1992.
DOI : 10.1016/0950-4230(92)80022-Z

C. Alonso and J. Gavalda, « a method to determine environmental risk in chemical process industries, proceeding from 9 th International Sy: Promotion in the Process Industries proceeding from 9 th International Symposium Loss Prevention and Safety Use of quantified risk assessment in evaluating the risks of transporting chlorine by road and rail, pp.1219-1227, 1430.

S. A. Gadd, D. G. Leeming, and T. N. Riley, « Transport Riskat : the HSE quantified risk assessment tool for toxic and flammable dangerous goods transport by road and rail in Great Britain, proceeding from 9 th International Symposium Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries, pp.308-317, 1998.

W. P. Schlechter, Facility risk review as a means to addressing existing risks during the life cycle of a process unit, operation or facility, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, vol.66, issue.1-3, pp.387-402, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/0308-0161(95)00113-1

K. Davoudian, J. S. Wu, and G. Apostolakis, Action Errors Analysis AEA [2] Checklist [5] Concept Hazard Analysis CHA [2] [3] Concept Safety Review CSR [2] Failure Mode Effect Analysis FMEA [2] [5] [6] Goal Orinted Failure Analysis GOFA [2] Hazard and Operability HAZOP [2] [5] [6] [8] [9] Human Hazard and Operability HumanHAZOP [9] Insurers involvement in risk reduction process [11] Manager [16] Optimal Hazard and Operability OptHAZOP [5] [10] Plant Level Safety Analysis PLSA [7] Potential domino effects identification [14] Preliminary Risks Analysis PRA, The work process analysis model (WPAM) », Reliability Engineering and System Safety Process Risk Management Audit PRIMA [15] Profile Deviation Analysis PDA [4] Safety related questions for computer controlled plants [12] [13] Seqhaz Hazard Mapping SHM [4] Sneak Analysis [2] Task Analysis TA [2] What if? Analysis [2] [5] [6] World Health Organisation WHO [5] Accident Sequences Precursor ASP [27] Delphi Technique [2] Earthquake safety of structures and installations in chemical industries, pp.107-125, 1994.

O. Hazard and O. Opthazop, Optimal Risk Assessment ORA [5] Plant Level Safety Analysis PLSA [7] Potential domino effects identification [14] Preliminary Risks Analysis PRA

. Short-cut-risk and S. Assessment, Sneak Analysis [2] Structural Reliability Analysis SRA [2] Toxic Damage Index TDI [17] What if? Analysis [2] [5] [6] World Health Organisation WHO