Uncertainty of emission measurements for manual and automatic reference methods. Comparison between uncertainty budget approach and inter-laboratory field test approach

Abstract : The aim of this presentation is to give a comparison of the GUM approach which gives an overall uncertainty calculated through an uncertainty budget and the field approach which gives repeatability and reproducibility uncertainties. Two examples will be shown from the experiences within CEN TC264 WG16 by means of a manual reference method for SO2 and an automatic reference method for NOX.
Document type :
Conference papers
Complete list of metadatas

https://hal-ineris.archives-ouvertes.fr/ineris-00972425
Contributor : Gestionnaire Civs <>
Submitted on : Thursday, April 3, 2014 - 4:28:31 PM
Last modification on : Monday, November 27, 2017 - 10:46:01 PM
Long-term archiving on : Thursday, July 3, 2014 - 5:21:14 PM

File

2003-062_hal.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : ineris-00972425, version 1
  • INERIS : PU-2003-062

Collections

Citation

Jean Poulleau, Cécile Raventos, Frans Blank, Lukas Emmenegger, Richard Gould, et al.. Uncertainty of emission measurements for manual and automatic reference methods. Comparison between uncertainty budget approach and inter-laboratory field test approach. Workshop on Quality Assurance Quality Control and Accreditation, May 2003, Prague, Czech Republic. ⟨ineris-00972425⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

133

Files downloads

1055