Is resilience engineering realist or constructivist ? - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Conference Papers Year : 2008

Is resilience engineering realist or constructivist ?

(1) , (2)
1
2

Abstract

This exploratory paper questions whether resilience engineering is a realist or constructivist approach of safety. After a presentation of two positions: critical realism and radical constructivism, the authors explain how the frameworks provided by these two positions were used in different researches, answering different questions that arose during the work. For one, critical realism offered an answer to the problem of the relationship between agency and structure. For the other, radical constructivism afforded a good definition of what models can be thought as. Both developments show the relevance of taking into account of philosophical antecedents for applied research and how this is valuable for resilience engineering and the directions that could be pursued for future development.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
2008-298_hal.pdf (800.4 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Files produced by the author(s)
Loading...

Dates and versions

ineris-00976208 , version 1 (09-04-2014)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : ineris-00976208 , version 1

Cite

Jean-Christophe Le Coze, Kenneth Pettersen. Is resilience engineering realist or constructivist ?. 3. Resilience Engineering Symposium, Oct 2008, Antibes - Juan-les-Pins, France. pp.175-184. ⟨ineris-00976208⟩

Collections

INERIS
146 View
431 Download

Share

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More