, of the European Parliament and of the Council, on Classification, Labeling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures, Amending and Repealing Directives 67, EC, and Amending RegulationEC) Official J. Eur Union, vol.54845, issue.1272, p.353, 1907.
Chemical Induction of Cancer: Modulation and Combination Effects. An Inventory of the Many Factors Which Influence Carcinogenesis, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4612-4076-1
Mechanisms of action of chemical carcinogens, and their role in Structure-Activity Relationships (SAR) analysis and risk assessment. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) models of mutagens and carcinogens, pp.41-80, 2003. ,
Long-Term Chemical Carcinogenesis Bioassays Predict Human Cancer Hazards: Issues, Controversies, and Uncertainties, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol.79, issue.4, pp.56-79, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0304-3835(87)90154-6
Identification of Carcinogenic Agents and Primary Prevention of Cancer, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol.13, issue.1, pp.1-14, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1093/ije/dyh277
The causes of cancer. Revue d'épidémiologie et de santé publique, 2001. ,
Chemical carcinogenesis: too many rodent carcinogens., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, pp.7772-7776, 1990. ,
DOI : 10.1073/pnas.87.19.7772
Cancer in rodents: does it tell us about cancer in humans?, Nature Reviews Cancer, vol.1, issue.10, pp.807-819, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S1535-6108(02)00026-0
, ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT, vol.24
Animal carcinogenicity studies: 1. Poor human predictivity, 2006. ,
Animal carcinogenicity studies: 2. Obstacles to extrapolation of data to humans, 2004. ,
The Two-Year Rodent Carcinogenesis Bioassay ??? Will It Survive?, Journal of Toxicologic Pathology, vol.20, issue.1, pp.13-19, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1293/tox.20.13
The influence of chemical structure on the extent and sites of carcinogenesis for 522 rodent carcinogens and 55 different human carcinogen exposures, Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, vol.286, issue.1, pp.3-74, 1993. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0027-5107(93)90003-X
Rat or Mouse Cancer Bioassay?or None of the Above? Toxicologic pathology, pp.734-735, 1996. ,
In vitro tests within the REACH information strategies. Alternatives to laboratory animals: ATLA, pp.377-386, 2006. ,
Garrod JF: Integrated decision-tree testing strategies for mutagenicity and carcinogenicity with respect to the requirements of the EU REACH legislation. Alternatives to laboratory animals: ATLA, 36, pp.43-63, 2008. ,
The transgenic mouse assay as an alternative test method for regulatory carcinogenicity studies???Implications for REACH, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, vol.53, issue.2, pp.150-155, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.12.006
Predictivity of QSAR, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol.48, issue.5, pp.971-980, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci8000088
, ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT, vol.25
Predictivity and reliability of QSAR models: The case of mutagens and carcinogens. Toxicology mechanisms and methods, pp.137-147, 2008. ,
Origins of human cancer, pp.605-627, 1977. ,
Searches for ultimate chemical carcinogens and their reactions with cellular macromolecules, Cancer, vol.23, issue.10, pp.47-2327, 1981. ,
DOI : 10.1042/bj1230175
Chemical structure, Salmonella mutagenicity and extent of carcinogenicity as indicators of genotoxic carcinogenesis among 222 chemicals tested in rodents by the U.S. NCI/NTP, Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology, vol.204, issue.1, pp.17-115, 1988. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0165-1218(88)90114-0
mutagenicity assays, Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology, vol.35, issue.7, pp.809-819, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1501
Structure alerts for carcinogenicity, and the Salmonella assay system: A novel insight through the chemical relational databases technology, Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research, vol.659, issue.3, pp.248-261, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.mrrev.2008.05.003
Nongenotoxic Carcinogenicity of Chemicals: Mechanisms of Action and Early Recognition through a New Set of Structural Alerts, Chemical Reviews, vol.113, issue.5, pp.2940-2957, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1021/cr300206t
,
Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) models of chemical mutagens and carcinogens, 2003. ,
, ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT, vol.26
http://www2.epa.gov/tsca-screening-tools/oncologictm-computer-system- evaluate-carcinogenic-potential-chemicals ,
,
Automatic knowledge extraction from chemical structures: the case of mutagenicity prediction, SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research, vol.39, issue.5, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0027-5107(97)00118-8
,
,
, CAESAR project, no. 022674 ? SSPI
The Carcinogenic Potency Project and Database (CPDB) University of California National Laboratory; National Library of Medicine's (NLM®), 2011. ,
,
ISSCAN: Istituto Superiore di SanitaCHEMICAL CARCINOGENS: STRUCTURES AND EXPERIMENTAL DATA". https ,
Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens, Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, vol.584, issue.1-2, pp.1-256, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.02.004
,
, ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT, vol.27
https://www.chemaxon.com/products/instant-jchem-suite/instant- jchem ,
SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol.28, issue.1, pp.31-36, 1988. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci00057a005
, eChemPortal. In. OECD
,
Mining toxicity structural alerts from SMILES: A new way to derive Structure Activity Relationships, 2011 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM), pp.11-15, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1109/CIDM.2011.5949444
The Importance of Being Earnest: Validation is the Absolute Essential for Successful Application and Interpretation of QSPR Models, QSAR & Combinatorial Science, vol.38, issue.1, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.6028/jres.090.043
, QSAR & Combinatorial Science, vol.22, issue.1, pp.69-77
QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE???ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP METHODS: PERSPECTIVES ON DRUG DISCOVERY AND TOXICOLOGY, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, vol.22, issue.8, pp.1666-1679, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1897/01-171
Molecular Fingerprints of Environmental Carcinogens in Human Cancer, Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part C, vol.61, issue.18, pp.188-228, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1002/tox.21795
Derivation and Validation of Toxicophores for Mutagenicity Prediction, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol.48, issue.1, pp.312-320, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1021/jm040835a
, ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT, vol.28
Evaluation of QSAR Models for the Prediction of Ames Genotoxicity: A Retrospective Exercise on the Chemical Substances Registered Under the EU REACH Regulation, Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part C, vol.335, issue.3, pp.273-298, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1021/tx2000398
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ineris-01855014
ToxRead: A tool to assist in read across and its use to assess mutagenicity of chemicals, SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research, vol.38, issue.12, pp.25-999, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci900161g
Hierarchical Rules for Read-Across and In Silico Models of Mutagenicity, Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part C, vol.33, issue.4, pp.385-403, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci100253r
Alternative Toxicity Testing: Analyses on Skin Sensitization, ToxCast Phases I and II, and Carcinogenicity Provide Indications on How to Model Mechanisms Linked to Adverse Outcome Pathways, Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part C, vol.33, issue.4, pp.422-443, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1021/jm00196a017
, ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT, vol.29
, Table 1. R model internal and external validation for five different splits and the average of the model performance 1° split (59 active rules) 2° split (65 active rules) 3° split (61 active rules) 4° split (58 active rules, p.5
, Average Learning set