K. W. Appel, R. C. Gilliam, N. Davis, A. Zubrow, H. et al., Overview of the atmospheric model evaluation tool (AMET) v1.1 for evaluating meteorological and air quality models, Environmental Modelling & Software, vol.26, issue.4, pp.434-443, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.09.007

K. Baldridge and W. Cox, Evaluating air quality model performance, Environmental Software, vol.1, issue.3, pp.182-18710, 1986.
DOI : 10.1016/0266-9838(86)90023-7

B. Bessagnet, G. Pirovano, M. Mircea, C. Cuvelier, A. Aulinger et al., Presentation of the EURODELTA III intercomparison exercise ??? evaluation of the chemistry transport models' performance on criteria pollutants and joint analysis with meteorology, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol.16, issue.19, pp.12667-1270110, 2016.
DOI : 10.5194/acp-16-12667-2016-supplement

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ineris-01863109

P. Campbell, Y. Zhang, K. Yahya, K. Wang, C. Hogrefe et al., A multi-model assessment for the 2006 and 2010 simulations under the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII) phase 2 over North America: Part I. Indicators of the sensitivity of O 3 and PM 2.5 formation regimes, Atmospheric Environment, vol.115, pp.569-586, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.12.026

J. Chang and S. Hanna, Air quality model performance evaluation, Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, vol.87, issue.1-3, pp.167-196, 2004.
DOI : 10.1007/s00703-003-0070-7

W. M. Cox and J. A. Tikvart, A statistical procedure for determining the best performing air quality simulation model, Atmospheric Environment. Part A. General Topics, vol.24, issue.9, pp.2387-239510, 1990.
DOI : 10.1016/0960-1686(90)90331-G

S. Galmarini, R. Bianconi, W. Appel, E. Solazzo, S. Mosca et al., ENSEMBLE and AMET: Two systems and approaches to a harmonized, simplified and efficient facility for air quality models development and evaluation, Atmospheric Environment, vol.53, pp.51-59, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.08.076

L. Menut, S. Mailler, G. Siour, B. Bessagnet, S. Turquety et al., Ozone and aerosol tropospheric concentrations variability analyzed using the ADRIMED measurements and the WRF and CHIMERE models, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol.15, issue.11
DOI : 10.1029/2008JD011219

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01206614

L. Menut, An alternative way to evaluate chemistry-transport model variability and CHIMERE models, Atmos. Chem. Phys, vol.155194, issue.10, pp.6159-6182, 2015.

L. Menut, G. Siour, S. Mailler, F. Couvidat, and B. Bessagnet, Observations and regional modeling of aerosol optical properties, speciation and size distribution over Northern Africa and western Europe, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol.16, issue.20, pp.12961-1298210, 2016.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1006415919030

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ineris-01863110

P. S. Porter, S. T. Rao, C. Hogrefe, E. Gego, and R. Mathur, Methods for reducing biases and errors in regional photochemical model outputs for use in emission reduction and exposure assessments, Atmospheric Environment, vol.112, pp.178-188, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.04.039

M. Prank, M. Sofiev, S. Tsyro, C. Hendriks, V. Semeena et al., Evaluation of the performance of four chemical transport models in predicting the aerosol chemical composition in Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys, vol.165194, pp.6041-607010, 2005.

H. Simon, K. Baker, and S. Phillips, Compilation and interpretation of photochemical model performance statistics published between 2006 and 2012, Atmospheric Environment, vol.61, pp.124-139, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.012

E. Solazzo and S. Galmarini, Comparing apples with apples: Using spatially distributed time series of monitoring data for model evaluation, Atmospheric Environment, vol.112, pp.234-245, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.04.037

E. Solazzo and S. Galmarini, Error apportionment for atmospheric chemistry-transport models: a new approach to model evaluation, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, vol.16, pp.6263-628310, 2016.
DOI : 10.5194/acp-2016-15-RC2

P. Thunis, A. Pederzoli, and D. Pernigotti, Performance criteria to evaluate air quality modeling applications, Atmospheric Environment, vol.59, pp.476-482, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.05.043

K. Tørseth, W. Aas, K. Breivik, A. M. Fjaeraa, M. Fiebig et al., Introduction to the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) and observed atmospheric composition change during, Atmos. Chem. Phys, vol.125194, pp.5447-548110, 1972.

M. Valari and L. Menut, Does an Increase in Air Quality Models??? Resolution Bring Surface Ozone Concentrations Closer to Reality?, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, vol.25, issue.11, pp.10-1175, 1955.
DOI : 10.1175/2008JTECHA1123.1

R. Vautard, M. D. Moran, E. Solazzo, R. C. Gilliam, V. Matthias et al., Evaluation of the meteorological forcing used for the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII) air quality simulations, Atmospheric Environment, vol.53, pp.15-37, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.065