Overview of the atmospheric model evaluation tool (AMET) v1.1 for evaluating meteorological and air quality models, Environmental Modelling & Software, vol.26, issue.4, pp.434-443, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.09.007
Evaluating air quality model performance, Environmental Software, vol.1, issue.3, pp.182-18710, 1986. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0266-9838(86)90023-7
Presentation of the EURODELTA III intercomparison exercise ??? evaluation of
the chemistry transport models' performance on criteria pollutants and joint
analysis with meteorology, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol.16, issue.19, pp.12667-1270110, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.5194/acp-16-12667-2016-supplement
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ineris-01863109
A multi-model assessment for the 2006 and 2010 simulations under the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII) phase 2 over North America: Part I. Indicators of the sensitivity of O 3 and PM 2.5 formation regimes, Atmospheric Environment, vol.115, pp.569-586, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.12.026
Air quality model performance evaluation, Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, vol.87, issue.1-3, pp.167-196, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00703-003-0070-7
A statistical procedure for determining the best performing air quality simulation model, Atmospheric Environment. Part A. General Topics, vol.24, issue.9, pp.2387-239510, 1990. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0960-1686(90)90331-G
ENSEMBLE and AMET: Two systems and approaches to a harmonized, simplified and efficient facility for air quality models development and evaluation, Atmospheric Environment, vol.53, pp.51-59, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.08.076
Ozone and aerosol tropospheric concentrations variability analyzed using the ADRIMED measurements and the WRF and CHIMERE models, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol.15, issue.11 ,
DOI : 10.1029/2008JD011219
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01206614
An alternative way to evaluate chemistry-transport model variability and CHIMERE models, Atmos. Chem. Phys, vol.155194, issue.10, pp.6159-6182, 2015. ,
Observations and regional modeling of aerosol optical properties, speciation and size distribution over Northern Africa and western Europe, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol.16, issue.20, pp.12961-1298210, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1023/A:1006415919030
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ineris-01863110
Methods for reducing biases and errors in regional photochemical model outputs for use in emission reduction and exposure assessments, Atmospheric Environment, vol.112, pp.178-188, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.04.039
Evaluation of the performance of four chemical transport models in predicting the aerosol chemical composition in Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys, vol.165194, pp.6041-607010, 2005. ,
Compilation and interpretation of photochemical model performance statistics published between 2006 and 2012, Atmospheric Environment, vol.61, pp.124-139, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.012
Comparing apples with apples: Using spatially distributed time series of monitoring data for model evaluation, Atmospheric Environment, vol.112, pp.234-245, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.04.037
Error apportionment for atmospheric chemistry-transport models: a new approach to model evaluation, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, vol.16, pp.6263-628310, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.5194/acp-2016-15-RC2
Performance criteria to evaluate air quality modeling applications, Atmospheric Environment, vol.59, pp.476-482, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.05.043
Introduction to the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) and observed atmospheric composition change during, Atmos. Chem. Phys, vol.125194, pp.5447-548110, 1972. ,
Does an Increase in Air Quality Models??? Resolution Bring Surface Ozone Concentrations Closer to Reality?, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, vol.25, issue.11, pp.10-1175, 1955. ,
DOI : 10.1175/2008JTECHA1123.1
Evaluation of the meteorological forcing used for the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII) air quality simulations, Atmospheric Environment, vol.53, pp.15-37, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.065