Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Quel retour d’expérience sur le retour d’expérience ?

Abstract : The disasters of the past years in different high risk industries (e.g. aviation, offshore, nuclear) push for a moment of reflexivity about learning from accidents. In the aftermath of these events, one wonders whether learning from accidents remains a viable endeavour for companies and states or whether recurring technological disasters such as these seriously and definitely undermine any attempt to prove the feasibility of learning. Progress has certainly been made in the past, but apparently not enough so to be able to reach the highest safety levels, even in systems with dedicated resources. As a result of the current situation, some have been able to argue that ‘we don’t learn about disasters’. Although appealing and right, this is a very generic statement. There are many studies addressing aspects of learning from accidents which are in a position to bring insights about the drawbacks of learning. But this wealth of research is also part of the problem. When one wants to step back and to look broadly at the topic, to understand the reason why ‘we don’t learn’, one is left with a fragmented scientific literature covering a very large spectrum of interests and views on the subject. This short paper tackles this problem by designing a framework to organise the diversity of studies.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata
Contributor : Gestionnaire Civs Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Thursday, September 6, 2018 - 2:52:40 PM
Last modification on : Friday, September 7, 2018 - 1:11:30 AM
Long-term archiving on: : Saturday, December 8, 2018 - 12:22:58 AM


Publication funded by an institution


  • HAL Id : ineris-01869466, version 1



Jean-Christophe Le Coze. Quel retour d’expérience sur le retour d’expérience ?. Rapport Scientifique INERIS, 2013, 2012-2013, pp.62-63. ⟨ineris-01869466⟩



Record views


Files downloads